跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16400 · v1

FuGIBench: Evaluating Reliable Preparation in Streaming Video

首次提交 2026-11-12 15:10
版本更新 2026-11-12 15:10
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

An assistant watching a worker can prepare for an emerging need before the worker is ready to receive help.As the need evolves, the assistant must maintain preparation until a response is due, or withdraw it if the need disappears. Video anticipation and interactive response benchmarks leave this interval between early evidence and response largely unmeasured. We introduce FuGIBench (Future-Grounded Interaction), a streaming-video benchmark in which a model chooses among waiting, reversible preparation, and response given a causal video prefix and a task contract. The benchmark contains 19,893 synthetic tool-assistance videos across ten tool tasks, in handover, ordinary-activity, and cancelled-need tracks. One primary score credits sustained preparation, incorporates response-interval alignment, and penalizes activity when the reference prescribes waiting. On a frozen set of 1,000 episodes, a reference system with a longer preparation lead has poorer response alignment, while similar handover leads accompany different levels of activity during ordinary work in matched scenarios. Together with cancellation analyses, these results show why evaluating preparation requires tracking decisions as needs develop, become actionable, or disappear.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 15:10 · 最新观测版本

FuGIBench: Evaluating Reliable Preparation in Streaming Video

An assistant watching a worker can prepare for an emerging need before the worker is ready to receive help.As the need evolves, the assistant must maintain preparation until a response is due, or withdraw it if the need disappears. Video anticipation and interactive response benchmarks leave this interval between early evidence and response largely unmeasured. We introduce FuGIBench (Future-Grounded Interaction), a streaming-video benchmark in which a model chooses among waiting, reversible preparation, and response given a causal video prefix and a task contract. The benchmark contains 19,893 synthetic tool-assistance videos across ten tool tasks, in handover, ordinary-activity, and cancelled-need tracks. One primary score credits sustained preparation, incorporates response-interval alignment, and penalizes activity when the reference prescribes waiting. On a frozen set of 1,000 episodes, a reference system with a longer preparation lead has poorer response alignment, while similar handover leads accompany different levels of activity during ordinary work in matched scenarios. Together with cancellation analyses, these results show why evaluating preparation requires tracking decisions as needs develop, become actionable, or disappear.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗