跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.16523 · v1

RESYNC: Residual Latent-State Synchronization for Deadline-Bound Streaming Inference

首次提交 2026-11-12 17:19
版本更新 2026-11-12 17:19
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Predicting every observation in a high-rate stream requires a model to finish before the next arrival. A large model may offer better predictions but miss that deadline. We propose RESYNC: the large model runs asynchronously, while a fast path updates its latest exact but stale latent state using the observations received since that state was computed and applies its unchanged prediction head. The updater learns from the frozen model's representations without task labels. Across one real and two synthetic streams and five architecture families, RESYNC beats the best compact or distilled alternative with a paired 95% interval above zero in all twelve dataset--architecture pairs with a material teacher advantage at anchor ages of 4--12 observations, and in eleven pairs at older tested ages up to 32. The share of the teacher's gain preserved remains complete on the real stream but is lower and generally declines with anchor age on the synthetic streams. In live replay with 1 ms arrivals, the synchronous large models cannot deliver any predictions on time while RESYNC serves at least 99.4% of arrivals within the interval, with 0.35--0.62 ms median latency on one CPU thread: around the same speed as or faster than the compact model, and 7.9--17.7×\times faster than synchronous large-model inference. RESYNC targets settings with background compute available but a strict per-observation response deadline.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 17:19 · 最新观测版本

RESYNC: Residual Latent-State Synchronization for Deadline-Bound Streaming Inference

Predicting every observation in a high-rate stream requires a model to finish before the next arrival. A large model may offer better predictions but miss that deadline. We propose RESYNC: the large model runs asynchronously, while a fast path updates its latest exact but stale latent state using the observations received since that state was computed and applies its unchanged prediction head. The updater learns from the frozen model's representations without task labels. Across one real and two synthetic streams and five architecture families, RESYNC beats the best compact or distilled alternative with a paired 95% interval above zero in all twelve dataset--architecture pairs with a material teacher advantage at anchor ages of 4--12 observations, and in eleven pairs at older tested ages up to 32. The share of the teacher's gain preserved remains complete on the real stream but is lower and generally declines with anchor age on the synthetic streams. In live replay with 1 ms arrivals, the synchronous large models cannot deliver any predictions on time while RESYNC serves at least 99.4% of arrivals within the interval, with 0.35--0.62 ms median latency on one CPU thread: around the same speed as or faster than the compact model, and 7.9--17.7×\times faster than synchronous large-model inference. RESYNC targets settings with background compute available but a strict per-observation response deadline.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗