跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 11:35 — 2026-11-04 11:35(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 5 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.40252

Conformal Annotation with Randomized Expert Review: Application to Online Cell-Type Labeling

Xuhe Zhang, Zhi Huang, Ying Jin

Artificial intelligence (AI) models can accelerate cell-type annotation in digital pathology, but safely scaling their use requires determining, with error control, which model-generated labels can be accepted without expert review. This is challenging in evolving workflows because cell morphology and type composition may change across tissue regions and slides, making one-time calibration unreliable. We propose Conformal Annotation with Randomized Expert review under Distribution shift (CARED), a distribution-free framework that leverages randomized expert audit to achieve long-run error control for AI-assisted annotation under distribution shift. For each incoming batch, CARED uniformly selects a subset of cases for expert review and uses the acquired labels to calibrate later decisions. Among unreviewed cases, CARED determines a subset of them to safely skip expert labeling, while suggesting candidate labels for the others for downstream resolution. We prove that this workflow provides long-run control of cumulative error over both the full stream and the cells outside of the audit sample, without stationarity or exchangeability assumptions. We further enhance the framework by introducing class-conditional guarantees to ensure error control within important but rare cell types, together with a utility module to target more automatic resolutions, smaller candidate sets, and greater biological coherence, without compromising validity. Experiments on pancreas, lung, and ovary annotation streams, together with a stream constructed from real expert annotations, show that CARED controls the cumulative errors while a substantial fraction of cells (up to 70%) bypass expert review.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

stat.ME · cs.LG · stat.AP · stat.ML
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39441

PathCowork: Learning from real-world pathology practice to build AI copilots

Sheng Wang, Jialu Yao, Maria V. Rossi, Shunsuke Koga, Esther Baranov, MacLean P. Nasrallah, Songhao Li, Jonathan Xu 等 25 位作者

Medical AI learns from the answers doctors record, but rarely from how they interpret the evidence to reach them. Here we introduce PathCowork, a framework that turns pathologists' narrated examinations into supervision for visual grounding and procedures that guide diagnostic AI agents. Synchronized gaze, narration and navigation link visual findings to the process of interpreting them. Across 48 sessions from 16 pathologists, the platform captured 1,028 minutes of slide review. Using these data, we trained PathCowork-1T for server deployment and PathCowork-27B for local deployment, with improved visual grounding. Across five organ-specific evaluations, agents combining this grounding with recorded diagnostic procedures achieved primary task scores averaging 17.9 and 24.1 percentage points higher than Claude Code and Codex, respectively, with shorter processing times and lower inference costs. Compared to the state-of-the-art multiple-instance learning AIs, the PathCowork agent-proposed regions achieved higher prostate-grading scores with limited slide labels. PathCowork can also help construct pathology AI benchmarks where questions derived from the recordings identified difficulties in recognizing viewing context and rejecting inapplicable premises. In summary, PathCowork proposes a new paradigm to scale up the data collection and train pathology AI through transparent reasoning from diagnostic sessions, opening a path towards systems that learn directly from routine clinical practice.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38318

What Should a Navigator Remember? Spatiotemporal Memory for Zero-Shot Vision-Language Navigation

Yuhang Peng, Zhikai Wang, Ziyi Wang, Jiaru Zhong, Xiaoji Zheng, Jingzhi Huang, Yi Wang, Jiangtao Gong

Zero-shot vision-and-language navigation (VLN) requires an agent to use past observations without navigation-specific training. We study what information an 8B-scale navigation system should retain and how it should be organized for subsequent decisions. Our agent combines instruction progress, hierarchically compressed observation history anchored to poses, and accumulated geometry in complementary task, temporal, and spatial memories. An 8B observer summarizes observations, and an 8B reasoner uses the memories to select waypoint intents or request additional views, a geometric controller executes the selected targets. A semantic information perspective motivates the distinction between retaining evidence, making it accessible to the reasoner, and acquiring further observations. On R2R-CE val-unseen, the complete system achieves the highest among the evaluated Qwen3-based zero-shot baselines. Removing temporal memory reduces SR and sharply increases average path length from 16.9 to 39.1m, removing the spatial-map and planning component reduces SR as well. Real-world experiments on a Unitree Go2 show that our zero-shot method achieves higher success rates than the post-trained baseline in both corridor and office environments, suggesting better transfer to the evaluated real-world settings. As a complementary evaluation, LAW2 uses paired instruction interventions to examine behavioral responses, instruction following ability beyond endpoint success. These results support preserving task progress, observation history, and geometry in structured memory for zero-shot navigation with smaller open models.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.RO · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36592

LabWorld: Learning Interactive 4D Worlds for Scientific Experimentation

Suozhi Huang, Kelsey Fu, Binxu Li, Luna Lyu, Kaize Wu, Wenbo Lu, David Smerkous, Jiahan Li 等 15 位作者

Autonomous scientific agents must not only reason about experiments but also interact with the physical environments in which they are executed. Existing laboratory simulators typically rely on manually constructed assets and predefined procedures, while laboratory videos capture real equipment, layouts, and interactions but leave this information implicit in pixels. We introduce LabWorld, an agent-driven Real2Sim framework for reconstructing interactive 4D laboratory worlds from monocular RGB video. LabWorld recovers reusable 3D assets, a metric scene, time-varying object states, and procedure events. Multi-frame observations provide complementary evidence for asset and scene reconstruction, while motion reconstruction combines visual and geometric observations with event constraints encoding the spatial and temporal requirements of laboratory interactions. We evaluate LabWorld on real pipetting and vortexing videos collected in our laboratory against general-purpose agentic and dedicated reconstruction baselines. For pipetting, LabWorld achieves a mean Mask IoU of 0.501, exceeding the strongest baseline by 0.033. For vortexing, it achieves a mean Tube-Length-Normalized PCK-AUC of 0.638, exceeding the strongest baseline by 0.035. On five pipetting videos, event-conditioned reconstruction increases the fraction of modeled physical constraints satisfied from 14.3% (5/35) to 100% (35/35). The resulting worlds expose geometry, motion, articulation, and events as explicit, editable state for replay, inspection, and future embodied scientific systems.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2406.07496Google Research

TextGrad:通过文本进行自动“微分”

TextGrad: Automatic "Differentiation" via Text

Mert Yuksekgonul, Federico Bianchi, Joseph Boen, Sheng Liu, Zhi Huang, Carlos Guestrin, James Zou

AI 速览:TextGrad 利用 LLM 提供的文本反馈对复合 AI 系统进行类似自动微分的优化,并在多种任务上展示了效果。

AI is undergoing a paradigm shift, with breakthroughs achieved by systems orchestrating multiple large language models (LLMs) and other complex components. As a result, developing principled and automated optimization methods for compound AI systems is one of the most important new challenges. Neural networks faced a similar challenge in its early days until backpropagation and automatic differentiation transformed the field by making optimization turn-key. Inspired by this, we introduce TextGrad, a powerful framework performing automatic ``differentiation'' via text. TextGrad backpropagates textual feedback provided by LLMs to improve individual components of a compound AI system. In our framework, LLMs provide rich, general, natural language suggestions to optimize variables in computation graphs, ranging from code snippets to molecular structures. TextGrad follows PyTorch's syntax and abstraction and is flexible and easy-to-use. It works out-of-the-box for a variety of tasks, where the users only provide the objective function without tuning components or prompts of the framework. We showcase TextGrad's effectiveness and generality across a diverse range of applications, from question answering and molecule optimization to radiotherapy treatment planning. Without modifying the framework, TextGrad improves the zero-shot accuracy of GPT-4o in Google-Proof Question Answering from $51\%$ to $55\%$, yields $20\%$ relative performance gain in optimizing LeetCode-Hard coding problem solutions, improves prompts for reasoning, designs new druglike small molecules with desirable in silico binding, and designs radiation oncology treatment plans with high specificity. TextGrad lays a foundation to accelerate the development of the next-generation of AI systems.

cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗