跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.09763 · v1

Link-Level Performance Comparison of 5G Beamforming: Reciprocity-Based SVD vs. Codebook-Based Precoding

首次提交 2026-11-07 01:26
版本更新 2026-11-07 01:26
雷达观测 2026-11-09 13:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Downlink (DL) precoding in mid-band MIMO relies on uplink (UL) sounding reference signals (SRS) with reciprocity-based singular value decomposition (SVD) or channel state information reference signals (CSI-RS) with codebook-based precoding matrix indicator (PMI) feedback. Although SVD precoding offers unquantized beamforming, it depends on a channel estimate from SRS transmitted at the limited user equipment (UE) power, whereas Type-I PMI is quantized but derived from a high-power CSI-RS based channel estimate. In this paper, we compare SRS-SVD and CSIRS-PMI for single-user MIMO through an end-to-end, 3GPP-compliant link-level simulation at 3.75 GHz with 100 MHz bandwidth, using a 192 antenna element gNB mapped into 32 ports, the 3GPP Release 19 UE antenna model, and ray-traced (RT) channels in Manhattan and Chicago. We show that neither scheme is uniformly superior: CSIRS-PMI serves weak and shadowed users better and reduces outage, whereas SRS-SVD achieves higher spectral efficiency (SE) and enables more multi-layer transmission for users with strong channels. The results on the Clustered Delay Line (CDL)-C statistical channel also confirm this crossover. We further show that by utilizing a simple logistic regression based on the received power of the standard CSI reference signal (CSI-RSRP) and the channel quality indicator (CQI), the gNB can select the optimal transmission scheme with around 90% accuracy, achieving an SE that closely approaches an ideal per-user selection.

作者备注:7 pages, 8 figures. Submitted to IEEE ICC 2027

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 01:26 · 最新观测版本

Link-Level Performance Comparison of 5G Beamforming: Reciprocity-Based SVD vs. Codebook-Based Precoding

Downlink (DL) precoding in mid-band MIMO relies on uplink (UL) sounding reference signals (SRS) with reciprocity-based singular value decomposition (SVD) or channel state information reference signals (CSI-RS) with codebook-based precoding matrix indicator (PMI) feedback. Although SVD precoding offers unquantized beamforming, it depends on a channel estimate from SRS transmitted at the limited user equipment (UE) power, whereas Type-I PMI is quantized but derived from a high-power CSI-RS based channel estimate. In this paper, we compare SRS-SVD and CSIRS-PMI for single-user MIMO through an end-to-end, 3GPP-compliant link-level simulation at 3.75 GHz with 100 MHz bandwidth, using a 192 antenna element gNB mapped into 32 ports, the 3GPP Release 19 UE antenna model, and ray-traced (RT) channels in Manhattan and Chicago. We show that neither scheme is uniformly superior: CSIRS-PMI serves weak and shadowed users better and reduces outage, whereas SRS-SVD achieves higher spectral efficiency (SE) and enables more multi-layer transmission for users with strong channels. The results on the Clustered Delay Line (CDL)-C statistical channel also confirm this crossover. We further show that by utilizing a simple logistic regression based on the received power of the standard CSI reference signal (CSI-RSRP) and the channel quality indicator (CQI), the gNB can select the optimal transmission scheme with around 90% accuracy, achieving an SE that closely approaches an ideal per-user selection.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗