跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11464 · v1

Off-Policy RL with Online Inference Tuning: My Solution to the CoRL 2026 RoboEval Challenge

首次提交 2026-11-08 23:53
版本更新 2026-11-08 23:53
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The CoRL 2026 RoboEval challenge has eight bimanual tasks, and it ranks a policy not only on whether it succeeds but on how: every stage of the task, done safely, efficiently and with both arms in coordination, scored against human demonstrations. My solution has two parts. The generic part, carried over from my LeHome challenge solution, is off-policy RL on a $π_{0.5}$-based policy that is also its own value function. It is trained with AWR and RECAP on advantages of the exact official score, in a loop where every rollout is at the same time a Thompson-sampling trial of about 20 inference parameters. Out of the box, it took the policy to 0.85 RDS on held-out seeds in two days (and it was still very far from convergence). The competition-specific part adds data that local exploration cannot find: generated demonstrations that reach the full reward, and recovery episodes that start from the policy's own failures. The submitted policy reaches 0.990 RDS on held-out seeds and 0.987 on the official seeds.

作者备注:Technical report for the RoboEval Challenge at CoRL 2026. Code: https://github.com/IliaLarchenko/RoboEvalSolution ; checkpoint: https://huggingface.co/IliaLarchenko/RoboEvalSolution ; project page: https://ilialarchenko.com/projects/roboeval2026/

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-08 23:53 · 最新观测版本

Off-Policy RL with Online Inference Tuning: My Solution to the CoRL 2026 RoboEval Challenge

The CoRL 2026 RoboEval challenge has eight bimanual tasks, and it ranks a policy not only on whether it succeeds but on how: every stage of the task, done safely, efficiently and with both arms in coordination, scored against human demonstrations. My solution has two parts. The generic part, carried over from my LeHome challenge solution, is off-policy RL on a $π_{0.5}$-based policy that is also its own value function. It is trained with AWR and RECAP on advantages of the exact official score, in a loop where every rollout is at the same time a Thompson-sampling trial of about 20 inference parameters. Out of the box, it took the policy to 0.85 RDS on held-out seeds in two days (and it was still very far from convergence). The competition-specific part adds data that local exploration cannot find: generated demonstrations that reach the full reward, and recovery episodes that start from the policy's own failures. The submitted policy reaches 0.990 RDS on held-out seeds and 0.987 on the official seeds.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗