跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.13906 · v1

Target Selection with a Disappearing-Stimulus Mixed-Reality P300 Interface: Feasibility and Object-Distinguishable Versus Uniform Cues

首次提交 2026-11-10 19:01
版本更新 2026-11-10 19:01
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:04
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Mixed-reality (MR) P300 interfaces can register selectable destinations, such as wheelchair goals, directly in the user's surroundings. When the cues disappear between flashes, however, the user must retain an intended target that is no longer visible. We tested whether such an interface supports target selection and whether giving each cue a stable colour-shape identity improves it compared with visually uniform spheres. Six healthy adults completed four trials in each cue condition of a 5x5 row/column task on a head-mounted MR display, with EEG from Fz, Cz, and Pz. Shrinkage linear discriminant analysis was evaluated with nested validation in which complete trials were held out from class balancing, hyperparameter selection, and fitting. Both conditions evoked a parietal target-related positivity. The decoded cell was correct in 18 of 48 held-out trials, against 1.9 expected by chance (binomial p < 1e-12), and in three participants individually. Cue format made no detectable difference: complete-target accuracy was 9/24 in both conditions (paired difference 0.0 percentage points, 95% CI [-37, 37]), and held-out AUC was 0.609 for spheres and 0.585 for object cues. Disappearing-stimulus MR P300 selection is therefore feasible under strict trial-level evaluation, but the benefit of object identity, if any, is too small to resolve in a pilot of this size.

作者备注:5 pages, 2 figures, 1 table

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-10 19:01 · 最新观测版本

Target Selection with a Disappearing-Stimulus Mixed-Reality P300 Interface: Feasibility and Object-Distinguishable Versus Uniform Cues

Mixed-reality (MR) P300 interfaces can register selectable destinations, such as wheelchair goals, directly in the user's surroundings. When the cues disappear between flashes, however, the user must retain an intended target that is no longer visible. We tested whether such an interface supports target selection and whether giving each cue a stable colour-shape identity improves it compared with visually uniform spheres. Six healthy adults completed four trials in each cue condition of a 5x5 row/column task on a head-mounted MR display, with EEG from Fz, Cz, and Pz. Shrinkage linear discriminant analysis was evaluated with nested validation in which complete trials were held out from class balancing, hyperparameter selection, and fitting. Both conditions evoked a parietal target-related positivity. The decoded cell was correct in 18 of 48 held-out trials, against 1.9 expected by chance (binomial p < 1e-12), and in three participants individually. Cue format made no detectable difference: complete-target accuracy was 9/24 in both conditions (paired difference 0.0 percentage points, 95% CI [-37, 37]), and held-out AUC was 0.609 for spheres and 0.585 for object cues. Disappearing-stimulus MR P300 selection is therefore feasible under strict trial-level evaluation, but the benefit of object identity, if any, is too small to resolve in a pilot of this size.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗