跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.15834 · v1

Where to Generate Touch: Do Image Latents Preserve Material Recognition?

首次提交 2026-11-12 02:46
版本更新 2026-11-12 02:46
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Generated touch could extend robot learning beyond recorded contacts. A tactile generator needs a latent space, and we choose one by testing whether a material classifier trained on real GelSight presses still works on encode-decode reconstructions from pretrained image models. On ObjectFolder Real, the classifier loses 6.5 to 9.7 points on reconstructions from three 16x discrete tokenizers and 0.3 points on those from the Stable Diffusion VAE (SD-VAE). The 16x tokenizers again lose far more on Touch and Go and on DIGIT object recognition (YCB-Slide). Retraining the classifier on reconstructions, with no new labels, narrows the discrete gap. SD-VAE reconstructions also keep object identity, with 76.7% object-matching accuracy against 78.9% for real touch and 67.0% for MAGVIT-v2. We therefore select SD-VAE latents and show a photo-to-touch generator trained in them. Code will be released upon acceptance.

作者备注:13 pages, 8 figures, 10 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-12 02:46 · 最新观测版本

Where to Generate Touch: Do Image Latents Preserve Material Recognition?

Generated touch could extend robot learning beyond recorded contacts. A tactile generator needs a latent space, and we choose one by testing whether a material classifier trained on real GelSight presses still works on encode-decode reconstructions from pretrained image models. On ObjectFolder Real, the classifier loses 6.5 to 9.7 points on reconstructions from three 16x discrete tokenizers and 0.3 points on those from the Stable Diffusion VAE (SD-VAE). The 16x tokenizers again lose far more on Touch and Go and on DIGIT object recognition (YCB-Slide). Retraining the classifier on reconstructions, with no new labels, narrows the discrete gap. SD-VAE reconstructions also keep object identity, with 76.7% object-matching accuracy against 78.9% for real touch and 67.0% for MAGVIT-v2. We therefore select SD-VAE latents and show a photo-to-touch generator trained in them. Code will be released upon acceptance.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗